Case Updates
California Supreme Court holds that Dynamex decision adopting ABC test for employee status applies retroactively
January 14, 2021
Click here to view the opinion.
U.S. Chamber files amicus brief urging California Supreme Court to hold that its opinion in Dynamex does not apply retroactively
August 14, 2020
Click here to view the Chamber’s brief. Jeremy B. Rosen, Peder K. Batalden, and Felix Shafir of Horvitz & Levy LLP served as co-counsel for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce on behalf of the U.S. Chamber Litigation Center.
Previously, the U.S. Chamber filed amicus briefs supporting a petition for rehearing en banc in the Ninth Circuit and urging the California Supreme Court to accept the Ninth Circuit’s certification request.
Request for certification granted
November 20, 2019
U.S. Chamber files amicus brief urging California Supreme Court to accept the Ninth Circuit’s certification request and hold that its opinion in Dynamex does not apply retroactively
October 16, 2019
Click here to view the Chamber’s brief. Jeremy B. Rosen and Felix Shafir of Horvitz & Levy LLP served as co-counsel for the U.S. Chamber of Commerce on behalf of the U.S. Chamber Litigation Center.
Previously, the U.S. Chamber filed a brief supporting a petition for rehearing en banc in the Ninth Circuit.
Case Documents
- Ninth Circuit Opinion -- Vazquez v. Jan-Pro Franchising International, Inc. (California Supreme Court).pdf
- U.S. Chamber Amicus Brief -- Vazquez v. Jan-Pro Franchising International, Inc. (California Supreme Court).pdf
- U.S. Chamber Amicus Brief (merits) -- Vazquez v. Jan-Pro Franchising International, Inc. (California Supreme Court).pdf
- Opinion -- Vazquez v. Jan-Pro Franchising International, Inc. (California Supreme Court).pdf