Arbitration
Our Work
Arbitration is a fairer, faster, and less expensive way for workers and consumers to resolve conflicts. It is less costly and time-consuming than courtroom litigation. But arbitration is continuously under attack from plaintiffs’ lawyers, who often benefit the most, financially, from lawsuits. The Chamber Litigation Center and Institute for Legal Reform fight to preserve arbitration at federal and state levels.
Latest Content
With the economy kicking into high gear, it seems an odd time for a handful of legislators to introduce a bill that would throw a wrench...
As observers of labor policy know quite well, organized labor is at its lowest point since the mid-1930s, and unions and their allies...
On November 1, Democrats in the U.S. Congress released several labor-related proposals as part of their so-called “Better Deal...”
Many people recognize October 31 for the great tradition of Halloween and the tricks and treats that come with it. This year...
The United States Supreme Court on October 2 heard oral arguments in a trio of closely-watched cases...
The average payout for consumers in class action lawsuits is about $32 while the average plaintiff’s lawyer pockets $1 million.
The CFPB wants to stop the use of an efficient, cost-effective dispute resolution tool for consumers and businesses.
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Lisa A. Rickard, president of the U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform (ILR), and David Hirschmann, president and CEO of the U.S. Chamber Center for Capital Markets Competitiveness (CCMC), issued the following statement today following House passage of H.J. Res. 111, disapproving of the CFPB’s arbitration rule:
After two years of waiting, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau released its anti-arbitration rule last week.
Under the Obama administration, the Democratic majority of the National Labor Relations Board took an overly expansive view of how the National Labor Relations Act...
