Arbitration
Our Work
Arbitration is a fairer, faster, and less expensive way for workers and consumers to resolve conflicts. It is less costly and time-consuming than courtroom litigation. But arbitration is continuously under attack from plaintiffs’ lawyers, who often benefit the most, financially, from lawsuits. The Chamber Litigation Center and Institute for Legal Reform fight to preserve arbitration at federal and state levels.
Latest Content
- Mass arbitration, intended as an efficient dispute resolution mechanism, is increasingly exploited through abusive practices that prioritize quick settlements over claim merit, harming all stakeholders and prompting calls for systemic reforms by courts, legislators, regulators, and industry actors.This Coalition Letter was sent to Members of the United States Congress on ArbitrationArbitration is a fairer, faster, and less expensive way to resolve disputes than time-consuming and expensive litigation.This Coalition letter was sent to the members of the United States Congress, opposing numerous bills attempting to prohibit arbitration and class action waiver provisions that have been introduced or proposed in the 118th CongressThis Hill letter was sent to the Members of the United States Senate on S. 2226, the "Fiscal Year 2024 National Defense Authorization Act."This Hill letter was sent to the Members of the U.S. House of Representatives, on H.R. 2670, the "Fiscal Year 2024 National Defense Authorization Act."This Hill letter was sent to the Members of the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, opposing S. 1094, the "Journalism Competition and Preservation Act (JCPA) of 2023."Arbitration doesn’t pose a risk to consumers. It benefits them. Why is the CFPB trying to ban it?
